Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach
Law E., Roto V., Hassenzahl M., Vermeeren A., Kort J.  CHI 2009 (Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, Apr 4-9, 2009)719-728.2009.Type:Proceedings
Date Reviewed: Nov 25 2009

User experience (UX) is a term that has been gaining a lot of momentum lately. For a company that provides products and services, UX is often thought to be a critical factor that significantly impacts its success. But what exactly is UX?

According to this paper, in spite of its increasing momentum, there is no real agreement on a definition of UX. Law et al.’s survey attempts to gain a wider perspective on researchers’ and practitioners’ perceptions of UX. This paper presents the results of the survey, along with the authors’ conclusions as to how they would define UX.

The bulk of the paper focuses on the survey and its results. The survey asked 275 researchers and practitioners involved with UX to complete three sections. In the first section, “UX Statements,” the respondents were asked to indicate how much they agreed or disagreed with a given statement pertaining to UX. In the second section, “UX Definitions,” the respondents provided their opinions of five different proposed definitions for UX. The final section, “Your Background,” solicited demographic information, including work experience and education.

While the survey is quite interesting, the findings, as presented in this paper, are hard to digest without a solid background in statistics. Understandably, the authors must demonstrate the accuracy of their results, but the excessive treatment of variables and confidence intervals limits what the layperson can take away from this paper.

Based on the results of the survey, Law et al. conclude that many researchers and practitioners tend to agree that UX is dynamic, context-dependent, and subjective.

Reviewer:  Susan Chopra Review #: CR137526 (1101-0083)
Bookmark and Share
  Reviewer Selected
 
 
User/ Machine Systems (H.1.2 )
 
 
General (H.5.0 )
 
 
Miscellaneous (H.m )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "User/Machine Systems": Date
The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation
Shneiderman B.  Human factors and interactive computer systems (, New York,281984. Type: Proceedings
May 1 1985
Reading continuous text from a one-line visual display
Monk A. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 21(3): 269-277, 1984. Type: Article
Oct 1 1985
Readings on cognitive ergonomics - mind and computers
van der Veer G., Tauber M. (ed), Green T. (ed), Gorny P. (ed)  Readings on cognitive ergonomics - mind and computers,Gmunden, Austria,1984. Type: Whole Proceedings
May 1 1986
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy