Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Measurement Modeling Technology
Lawler J., Kitchenham B. IEEE Software20 (3):68-75,2003.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Mar 22 2004

Lawler and Kitchenham present an automated measurement model that provides a standard method for defining measures and metrics.

Currently, most companies’ measurement programs suffer both from a lack of metric standards, and from invalid and missing data. This reduces data comparability and confidence in report validity. The authors propose a measurement model that is automated by the TychoMetrics commercial tool. The proposed model and tool address the following components of a measurement program: definition of measurements to collect and metrics to calculate; links between measures and development tools; automatic interrogation of development tools; and data extraction, instantiation, storage, collation, and reporting.

This paper describes how to define a measurement protocol that allows full automation of the measurement process. The authors present the measurement protocol’s static elements: atomic measures; measurement sources that include one or more atomic measures; measurement schemas that model relationships between measurement groups within a particular measurement source; and measurement object models that result from combining two or more measurement schemas, or portions of schemas. The TychoMetrics tool instantiates the measurements’ object models with actual data values, from the company automating the calculation of metrics and generation of reports.

Recent software engineering trends have been pushing companies to adopt formal measurement programs. Despite this need, existing programs do not deliver currently required capabilities. This work provides a consistent measurement model that ensures consistent data collection, which in turn increases the validity of the data analysis results. The work delivers on its promise, since it finds a more rigorous approach to data collection than the ad hoc system used today by most organizations. This is an example of a reliable and rigorous work.

Reviewer:  Natalia Juristo Review #: CR129286 (0409-1075)
Bookmark and Share
 
Performance Measures (D.2.8 ... )
 
 
Process Metrics (D.2.8 ... )
 
 
Software Process Models (D.2.9 ... )
 
 
Software Quality Assurance (SQA) (D.2.9 ... )
 
 
Metrics (D.2.8 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Performance Measures": Date
Applied software measurement
Jones C., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1991. Type: Book (9780070328136)
Aug 1 1992
The measurement of locality and the behaviour of programs
Bunt R., Murphy J. The Computer Journal 27(3): 238-253, 1984. Type: Article
Feb 1 1985
Estimating the fault rate function
Jennings T. IBM Systems Journal 31(2): 300-312, 1992. Type: Article
May 1 1994
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy