Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Browse by topic Browse by titles Authors Reviewers Browse by issue Browse Help
Search
  Browse All Reviews > Software (D) > Software Engineering (D.2) > Metrics (D.2.8) > Performance Measures (D.2.8...)  
 
Options:
 
  1-10 of 30 Reviews about "Performance Measures (D.2.8...)": Date Reviewed
  Model-based performance analysis of software architectures under uncertainty
Trubiani C., Meedeniya I., Cortellessa V., Aleti A., Grunske L.  QoSA 2013 (Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Jun 17-21, 2013) 69-78, 2013.  Type: Proceedings

In this paper, the authors aim “to explicitly consider uncertainty in the [software] performance modeling and analysis process” to evaluate its robustness. They propose a probabilistic formulation of parameter uncer...

Sep 27 2013
  Can complexity, coupling, and cohesion metrics be used as early indicators of vulnerabilities?
Chowdhury I., Zulkernine M.  SAC 2010 (Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Sierre, Switzerland, Mar 22-26, 2010) 1963-1969, 2010.  Type: Proceedings

Dealing with complexity is the third most important concern for software engineers. This wonderful paper proposes that “complexity, coupling, and cohesion [...] can be measured and used to evaluate the quality of software.&am...

Feb 15 2011
  Cross-project defect prediction: a large scale experiment on data vs. domain vs. process
Zimmermann T., Nagappan N., Gall H., Giger E., Murphy B.  ESEC/FSE 2009 (Proceedings of the 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Aug 24-28, 2009) 91-100, 2009.  Type: Proceedings

For the last 20 years, software professionals have sought the “silver bullet” of testing: the ability to predict software defect rates for the next project. Researching this goal from a cross-project perspective see...

Dec 29 2009
  Evaluating advantages of test driven development: a controlled experiment with professionals
Canfora G., Cimitile A., Garcia F., Piattini M., Visaggio C.  International symposium on empirical software engineering (Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sep 21-22, 2006) 364-371, 2006.  Type: Proceedings

The results of a controlled experiment on test-driven development (TDD) with 28 software professionals are reported. In a counter-balanced experimental design, subjects tackled one assignment using TDD and another assignment using test...

Jun 25 2007
  Evaluating the efficacy of test-driven development: industrial case studies
Bhat T., Nagappan N.  Empirical software engineering (Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Sep 21-22, 2006) 356-363, 2006.  Type: Proceedings

Test-driven development (TDD) reduces defect density by at least a factor of two at the expense of increasing coding time by 15 to 35 percent. Finally, we have measures on which to base project management decisions. Or do we? The measu...

Jun 22 2007
  A Simulation Study of the Model Evaluation Criterion MMRE
Foss T., Stensrud E., Kitchenham B., Myrtveit I. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29(11): 985-995, 2003.  Type: Article

The mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE) statistic is an unreliable criterion to use in the evaluation and comparison of software prediction models. Furthermore, previous studies that have used MMRE as a basis of model comparison ma...

May 26 2005
  Effective test metrics for test strategy evolution
Chen Y., Probert R., Robeson K.  Collaborative research (Proceedings of the 2004 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, Markham, Ontario, Canada, Oct 4-7, 2004) 111-123, 2004.  Type: Proceedings

Measurement plays a crucial role in software development. As the market demands faster development of more complex systems, the need to measure process characteristics in order to improve the development increases....

Feb 23 2005
  SPOT: development tool for software pipeline optimization for VLIW-DSPs used in real-time image processing
Fürtler J., Mayer K., Krattenthaler W., Bajla I. Real-Time Imaging 9(6): 387-399, 2003.  Type: Article

Computation efficiency is crucial in real-time digital signal processing (DSP). The efficiency provided by a modern, code-optimizing compiler is often good enough, but sometimes it is necessary to write software pipelines in a schedule...

Aug 18 2004
  Clustered calculation of worst-case execution times
Ermedahl A., Stappert F., Engblom J.  Compilers, architectures and synthesis for embedded systems (International Conference on Compilers, Architectures and Synthesis for Embedded Systems (CASES'2000), San Jose, California, USA, Nov 17-19, 2000) 51-62, 2003.  Type: Proceedings

In this significant contribution, the authors present a new method to handle complex flow information with low computational complexity, using generation of safe and tight worst-case execution time (WCET) estimates....

May 28 2004
  Measurement Modeling Technology
Lawler J., Kitchenham B. IEEE Software 20(3): 68-75, 2003.  Type: Article

Lawler and Kitchenham present an automated measurement model that provides a standard method for defining measures and metrics....

Mar 22 2004
 
 
 
Display per page
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy