Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Semiotic schemas: a framework for grounding language in action and perception
Roy D. Artificial Intelligence167 (1-2):170-205,2005.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: May 17 2006

One of the major challenges for the cognitive sciences is the development of a computationally tractable and precise theory of language that enables the generation of actions based on the referential meaning provided by the theory. It is the thesis of this paper that this goal should be achieved through a grounding process, where, much as a child first perceives the world through the results of its actions in the world, the system acquires references through a process of associating sensor inputs with system beliefs.

The core of the paper is an overview of how this can be done. The basis for the system is a theory of signs, projections, and schemas. Briefly, a sign represents some limited aspect of an object--a sensor input, for example. A projection maps signs into beliefs; a particularly important kind of projection would be a categorizer that matches beliefs to identifications of objects. Action projections associate actions with their effects. Schemas assemble beliefs and projections into representations of situations. Here, action projections are important precisely because they serve to ground schemas. Note that the approach differs from that of the blocks world, in that no preset model of the world is provided to the system. The paper makes a strong case for this approach to grounding language. The case is reinforced with references to experiments with a manipulator robot called Ripley [1].

The paper should be read by anyone with an interest in natural language processing. The actual implementation of such a system is a separate matter, for which the paper provides references to other sources, such as the work with Ripley.

Reviewer:  J. P. E. Hodgson Review #: CR132788 (0703-0297)
1) Roy, D.; Hsio, K.; Mavrides, N. Mental imagery for a conversational robot. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Part B 34, 3(2004), 1374–1383.
Bookmark and Share
  Featured Reviewer  
 
Language Models (I.2.7 ... )
 
 
Language Parsing And Understanding (I.2.7 ... )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Language Models": Date
A framework for investigating language-mediated interaction with machines
Zoeppritz M. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25(3): 295-315, 1986. Type: Article
Oct 1 1987
Prolog and natural-language analysis
Pereira F., Shieber S., CSLI/Stanford, Stanford, CA, 1987. Type: Book (9789780937073186)
Jun 1 1988
Competence and performance in the design of natural language systems
Bara B., Guida G., Elsevier North-Holland, Inc., New York, NY, 1984. Type: Book (9789780444875983)
Dec 1 1985
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy