Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Relativizations comparing NP and exponential time
Gasarch W., Homer S. (ed) Information and Control58 (1-3):88-100,1984.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Dec 1 1985

The authors hold that relationships between deterministic and non-deterministic complexity classes are unsettled. To help settle them, the authors adopt the polynomial time-bounded Turing machines and oracles approach used by others. In particular, the authors extend the work reported in 1983 by Homer and Maass [1] to show that for every oracle such as A, B, and C, and any arbitrary real k > 0,

(1) NP A ≠ EXPkA
(2) PA ⊊ NPA ⊊ EXPkA
(3) EXPkB ⊊ NPB
(4) NPC and EXPkC are incomparable under inclusion.

In developing these conclusions, the authors offer four theorems, one corollary, one proposition, and six lemmas. The proofs generally depend on set constructions.

Reviewer:  Ned Chapin Review #: CR108774
1) Homer, S.; and Maass, W.Oracle dependent properties of the lattice of NP sets, Theor. Comput. Sci. 24 (1983), 279–289.
Bookmark and Share
  Featured Reviewer  
 
Relations Among Complexity Classes (F.1.3 ... )
 
 
Relativized Computation (F.1.2 ... )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Relations Among Complexity Classes": Date
Separation of deterministic, nondeterministic and alternating complexity classes
Bebják A., Štefáneková I. Theoretical Computer Science 88(2): 297-311, 1991. Type: Article
Jan 1 1993
On the structure of one-tape nondeterministic Turing machine time hierarchy
Kobayashi K. Theoretical Computer Science 40(2-3): 175-193, 1985. Type: Article
May 1 1987
On bounded query machines
Balcázar J., Book R. (ed), Schöning U. (ed) Theoretical Computer Science 40(2-3): 237-243, 1985. Type: Article
Jul 1 1987
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy