Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Modeling POMDPs for generating and simulating stock investment policies
Baffa A., Ciarlini A.  SAC 2010 (Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Sierre, Switzerland, Mar 22-26, 2010)2394-2399.2010.Type:Proceedings
Date Reviewed: Aug 5 2010

Technical analysis indicators are tools that use current and past stock prices to come up with buy/sell recommendations. Baffa and Ciarlini show that the efficiency of these tools can be drastically improved if they are combined with partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) techniques.

Specifically, the authors assume that the state of the market at any moment in time can be described by its past trends and its future trend. The future trend is not directly observable; we assume that a technical analysis indicator provides partial information about it. The Markov character means that we assume that the probability of each state at the next moment in time depends only on the current state--it does not directly depend on past states. Baffa and Ciarlini then apply the known POMDP techniques to the training data, in order to determine the corresponding transition probabilities. The resulting model can predict the probability of different future states, and therefore provide buy/sell recommendations based on these predictions.

To empirically test these recommendations, the authors compare the performance of this methodology when applied to the 2008-2009 Brazilian stock prices, with the prices from 2000 to 2007 as the training data. Both periods include boom and crisis subperiods. For most indicators, combining the indicator with the POMDP techniques leads to much better performance than the indicator by itself. During the crisis period, the new recommendations would even enable users to gain a significant profit, while all known recommendations would lead to losses.

Reviewer:  V. Kreinovich Review #: CR138224 (1102-0216)
Bookmark and Share
  Featured Reviewer  
 
Problem Solving, Control Methods, And Search (I.2.8 )
 
 
Performance (D.4.8 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Problem Solving, Control Methods, And Search": Date
The use of a commercial microcomputer database management system as the basis for bibliographic information retrieval
Armstrong C. Journal of Information Science 8(5): 197-201, 1984. Type: Article
Jun 1 1985
Naive algorithm design techniques--a case study
Kant E., Newell A. (ed)  Progress in artificial intelligence (, Orsay, France,511985. Type: Proceedings
Mar 1 1986
SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence
Laird J. (ed), Newell A., Rosenbloom P. Artificial Intelligence 33(1): 1-64, 1987. Type: Article
Aug 1 1988
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy