Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Shape optimization with computational fluid dynamics
El-Sayed M., Sun T., Berry J. Advances in Engineering Software36 (9):607-613,2005.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Jan 26 2006

Determining optimal parameters for the design of curvy ducts poses computational challenges. Visual exploration of the transformations of curvilinear duct design space and response parameters requires optimization tools beyond the inevitable computational fluid dynamics of analytical simulations. It is complex to fuse numerical optimization techniques, computational fluid dynamics (CFDs), and surface geometry generation codes into algorithms for optimizing duct shapes.

Nonlinear algorithms for solving unconstrained and constrained optimization problems exist [1]. There are polynomial and spline functions for curve fitting of duct shapes [2]. CFDs are functional for forecasting fluid flow patterns. However, the design of efficient CFD-oriented optimization algorithms for applications in the computer-aided design of wavy ducts remains an open quandary. The authors developed a novel methodology for gaining ideas about design spaces and locating optimal design parameters of duct products. To implement a reliable shape optimization tool, they combined a nonlinearly constrained sequential quadratic programming optimization code, a steady airflow CFD code, and a surface geometry code. A test to locate the optimum shape of an airfoil with minimized pressure losses of both skin friction and turning flow bends required significant central processing unit (CPU) hours. Tests of the steady airflow of an S-shaped duct, with constraints on packaging space and geometry robustness, utilized significant CPU time as design variables increased. Designing efficient algorithms for duct shape optimization is still a venture. Nevertheless, the authors offer exceptional insights on code integration and reusability; in particular, the use of outputs as inputs in disparate computational models is novel.

Reviewer:  Amos Olagunju Review #: CR132369 (0609-0950)
Bookmark and Share
  Reviewer Selected
Featured Reviewer
 
 
Quadratic Programming Methods (G.1.6 ... )
 
 
Constrained Optimization (G.1.6 ... )
 
 
Geometrical Problems And Computations (F.2.2 ... )
 
 
Physics (J.2 ... )
 
 
Applications (G.1.10 )
 
 
Nonnumerical Algorithms And Problems (F.2.2 )
 
  more  
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Quadratic Programming Methods": Date
A method of trust region type for minimizing noisy functions
Elster C., Neumaier A. Computing 58(1): 31-46, 1997. Type: Article
Jun 1 1998
Perturbation to enhance support vector machines for classification
To K., Lim C. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 163(1): 233-239, 2004. Type: Article
May 19 2004
Minimizing quadratic functions subject to bound constraints with the rate of convergence and finite termination
Dostál Z., Schöberl J. Computational Optimization and Applications 30(1): 23-43, 2005. Type: Article
Aug 2 2005
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy