Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
The rising pitch metaphor: an empirical study
Rigas D., Alty J. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies62 (1):1-20,2005.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: May 26 2005

This paper describes a set of experiments that investigated the use of rising pitch notes to communicate graphical information to the visually impaired. It includes a good description of previous research, and concludes that the rising pitch metaphor can be used successfully.

The experiments are divided into four classes: coordinates, navigation with auditory cursor, graphical shapes, and size of graphical shapes. All experiments use an auditory design, based on sequences of rising pitch, of up to 40 distinct notes, on the chromatic musical scale. A 40-by-40, two-dimensional grid is conceived. Coordinates are obtained by using a piano tone for horizontal coordinates and an organ tone for vertical coordinates, sometimes by using a rising sequence of pitch notes, starting with the lowest and ending with the desired coordinates, and sometimes by just presenting two tones for the two coordinates. This is the auditory cursor.

For the coordinates class of experiments, subjects were tested on whether particular locations could be communicated. For the navigation with auditory cursor class, subjects were tested on moving the auditory cursor to various locations via an interesting interface. The graphical shapes class tested the subjects’ ability to recognize circles, squares, rectangles, and horizontal and vertical lines with the auditory cursor. The size of graphical shapes class tested subjects in estimating the size of these shapes.

Reading through this paper recalls when expensive and rudimentary embossing and sonography techniques, for teaching the blind to read text, were changed to a system of dots, using the work of the genius Louis Braille.

Reviewer:  J. Fendrich Review #: CR131331 (0512-1367)
Bookmark and Share
  Editor Recommended
 
 
Auditory (Non-Speech) Feedback (H.5.2 ... )
 
 
Assistive Technologies For Persons With Disabilities (K.4.2 ... )
 
 
Graphical User Interfaces (GUI) (H.5.2 ... )
 
 
Human Factors (H.1.2 ... )
 
 
Social Issues (K.4.2 )
 
 
User Interfaces (H.5.2 )
 
  more  
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Auditory (Non-Speech) Feedback": Date
Interactive Sonification of Choropleth Maps
Zhao H., Smith B., Norman K., Plaisant C., Shneiderman B. IEEE MultiMedia 12(2): 26-35, 2005. Type: Article
Jan 25 2006
Navigation with Auditory Cues in a Virtual Environment
Lokki T., Grohn M. IEEE MultiMedia 12(2): 80-86, 2005. Type: Article
Feb 23 2006
Visuals are not what they look
Bormann K. Virtual Reality 12(2): 115-123, 2008. Type: Article
Dec 5 2008
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy