This poorly written paper contains little material of significant interest. Commencing with yet another look at the inconsistencies of Ada (in this case declarative syntax), the author moves on to describe experiments using three mini-languages. Language I is an Ada subset that retains Ada’s inconsistencies; language II is a single Ada syntax form regularly extended to cover all declarations; and language III allows all Ada declarative syntax variants in all types of declarations (i.e., any given declaration can be written in many ways). The results of the experiments using volunteers showed II to have higher user acceptance and be easier to learn than III or I (I was the worst). Nonetheless, throughout the paper Henno dogmatically asserts the need to allow multiple syntax variants in languages. He dismisses the victory of mini-language II over III in his own experiments with a few “maybe” statements and the comment “the question of optimal syntax is a complicated one.” This paper is uninformative and substandard as a research effort.