Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Grosch’s law re-revisited: CPU power and the cost of computation
Ein-Dor P. Communications of the ACM28 (2):142-151,1985.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Oct 1 1985

This paper examines the validity of Grosch’s law [1] and then goes on to examine three important studies related to evaluating the performance of computers. These include one undertaken by Knight in the early 1960s [2,3]; a second major study by Solomon in the mid-1960s [4]; and, finally, one by Cale et al. completed in the late 1970s [5].

The author then presents his methodology for the measurement of computer power using six variables, including maximum memory, maximum channels, cycle time, relative performance, MIPS, and price. The 106 systems used in this analysis were grouped into five categories which included super computers, large mainframes, small mainframes, minicomputers, and microcomputers. The author then shows that Grosch’s law holds within each category. He postulates that an organization should select the most powerful computer within each category. This is a well-written paper in an area which has received very little attention during the last 25 years.

Reviewer:  Tom Richards Review #: CR109335
1) Grosch, H. A.High speed arithmetic: the digital computer as a research tool, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 4 (April 1953).
2) Knight, K. E.Changes in computer performance, Datamation (Sept. 1966), 40–54.
3) Knight, K. E.Evolving computer performance 1963–1967, Datamation (Jan. 1968), 31–35.
4) Solomon, M. B., Jr.Economies of scale and the IBM system/360, Commun. ACM 9 (1966), 435–440. See <CR> 7, 5 (Sept.-Oct. 1966), Rev. 10,286.
5) Cale, E. G.; Gremillion, L. L.; and McKenney, J. L.Price/performance patterns of US computer systems, Commun. ACM 22 (1979), 225–232.
Bookmark and Share
 
Pricing And Resource Allocation (K.6.2 ... )
 
 
Miscellaneous (K.6.m )
 
 
Performance of Systems (C.4 )
 
 
The Computer Industry (K.1 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Pricing And Resource Allocation": Date
Pricing computer services: queueing effects
Mendelson H. Communications of the ACM 28(3): 312-321, 1985. Type: Article
Dec 1 1985
Efficient collaboration between main and sub-suppliers
Fagerström B., Jackson M. Computers in Industry 49(1): 25-35, 2002. Type: Article
Jun 10 2003
MRCP-RM: a technique for resource allocation and scheduling of MapReduce jobs with deadlines
Lim N., Majumdar S., Ashwood-Smith P. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 28(5): 1375-1389, 2017. Type: Article
Jun 9 2017

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy