Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Grey comprehensive evaluation of universities’ scientific research capacity based on gray correlation
Zhang Z.  CICN 2012 (Proceedings of the 2012 4th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India, Nov 3-5, 2012)898-902.2012.Type:Proceedings
Date Reviewed: Apr 16 2013

Evaluating the research capacity of universities is an important task for governments and other stakeholders. The author tries to construct a method of quick and accurate evaluation based on objective factors.

According to the paper, evaluation is based on 11 factors: research team (the human factor); scientific research base (equipment, buildings, facilities); technological knowledge; research funding; research management; information receiving and processing capacity; knowledge accumulation and technological reserve capacity; scientific research and technological innovation; capacity of knowledge release; adaptive capacity; and scientific decision-making capacity.

Zhang applies the grey system methodology suggested by Deng Julong in 1982. The most important feature of this approach is that it doesn’t require a complete set of sample data and its distribution. The methodology is applied in a test case evaluating 31 universities.

The author concludes that “to improve their research capacity, [universities] need to improve all aspects of their research strength.” The recommendation to improve on all factors to achieve better overall results seems to be reasonable. However, in a real-life scenario, with limited resources, improving all aspects at the same time is rarely possible. Also, the notion of spreading efforts over all factors will give the desired results only if all factors are given the same or similar weight in the evaluation. This assumption may not be viable in real environments. Assigning the same weight to such factors as, for example, research buildings and research teams would be questionable.

The paper lacks a clear definition of the research problem and an explanation of the results. The size of the conference paper doesn’t allow for a comprehensive description of the method. Finally, the language of the paper is not always clear.

Reviewer:  Alexei Botchkarev Review #: CR141136 (1308-0746)
Bookmark and Share
  Reviewer Selected
 
 
Model Validation And Analysis (I.6.4 )
 
 
Uncertainty, “Fuzzy,” And Probabilistic Reasoning (I.2.3 ... )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Model Validation And Analysis": Date
An experimental procedure for simulation response surface model identification
Schruben L., Cogliano V. Communications of the ACM 30(9): 716-730, 1987. Type: Article
Oct 1 1988
Electronic prototyping
Hopcroft J. Computer 22(3): 55-57, 1989. Type: Article
Apr 1 1990
Interactive system identification
Bohlin T., Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, 1991. Type: Book (9780387536361)
Oct 1 1992
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy