Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Online recognition of handwritten music symbols
Oh J., Son S., Lee S., Kwon J., Kwak N. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition20 (2):79-89,2017.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Jul 14 2017

There has been some progress with the automatic recognition of handwriting in recent years, and the digital analysis of handwritten music poses similar problems. In this case, the online recognition of music symbols means analyzing individual symbols as they are written as opposed to optical music recognition (OMR), which analyzes musical images from sheet music or printed scores. The authors of this paper have analyzed discrete musical symbols as each is created using a stylus pen and device. This analysis uses the location of the start and finish of the strokes that are deemed to make up a symbol. To classify the set of strokes for each symbol, three features are deployed: size and the histograms of directional and unidirectional movement angles. Staves, bar lines, and time signatures are not included in the analysis. A novel algorithm based on feature allocation matches each set of strokes against two datasets of handwritten symbols. The first dataset, called HOMUS, was created by previous researchers. For this study, the authors identified 23 different strokes, which made up the chosen subset of 24 HOMUS symbols. The other dataset, SNU, was created during the project by 23 subjects, some of whom were music students. The SNU symbols were classified against the 24 identified in the HOMUS dataset, producing a subset of 16 in comparison.

One advantage of the method described here is that the writer does not have to use special methods such as a set of ordered discrete strokes to create the symbols. Another is that the rate of matching is better than a previous method, which used a different algorithm. However, several handwritten music editing systems for phones and tablets are currently available and the paper makes no reference to any of them. In addition, the history of the real-time digital analysis of all forms of music is much older than the 20 years proffered in this paper--for example, the Computer Music Journal was founded in 1977, and optical character recognition (OCR) for music notation was first attempted in 1966 [1].

Reviewer:  Rosa Michaelson Review #: CR145426 (1711-0754)
1) Bainbridge, D.; Bell, T. The challenge of optical music recognition. Computers and the Humanities 35, 2(2001), 95–121.
Bookmark and Share
 
Document Analysis (I.7.5 ... )
 
 
Music (J.5 ... )
 
 
Online Information Services (H.3.5 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Document Analysis": Date
Generating indicative-informative summaries with sumUM: a 3D dynamic virtual shop
Saggion H., Lapalme G. Computational Linguistics 28(4): 497-526, 2002. Type: Article
Jun 20 2003
Parameter-Free Geometric Document Layout Analysis
Lee S., Ryu D. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23(11): 1240-1256, 2001. Type: Article
Jul 26 2002
A hierarchical neural network document classifier with linguistic feature selection
Chen C., Lee H., Hwang C. Applied Intelligence 23(3): 277-294, 2005. Type: Article
Aug 2 2006
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy