Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Documenting the research through design process
Bardzell J., Bardzell S., Dalsgaard P., Gross S., Halskov K.  DIS 2016 (Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, Jun 4-8, 2016)96-107.2016.Type:Proceedings
Date Reviewed: Aug 9 2016

Most of today’s business is conducted, in a way, to find new knowledge that could be acquired through the documentation of the research done during the design process. The crucial activity for any professional design process is documentation, consisting of different information at each stage. Hence, the authors assume that documentation is also an embedded function for research through design, and they present a framework for planning and evaluating documentation of the research through design (RtD) process. They also assume that proper documentation is often lacking in design, especially in RtD, which opens up a new set of questions that should be answered in order to document the right things with the right tools.

The research community is richer with an added design perspective, creating a holistic approach to documenting the research through design process. The authors discuss the scope of the practice of documenting research through design by presenting the literature and available tools in use. They shape their analysis of RtD cases by “conversation between two RtD groups on the relationships between words/text and objects in RtD,” where each group knows the importance of RtD process documentation. Hence, two actual RtD cases are concisely presented following the three general aspects of RtD process documentation: the medium of RtD documentation, documents as speech acts, and supporting research and design. Based on actual insight into these two cases, the authors discuss the general aspects of RtD process documentation for each project case, giving users helpful information on their findings. These findings are also a great contribution to the literature in the field.

The authors also state one fundamental observation: although they tried to answer questions about what and how to document RtD, they are keen that the RtD community should be more active in developing communicative platforms that also include technical appliances accommodated to the design process and research activities.

Reviewer:  F. J. Ruzic Review #: CR144674 (1611-0847)
Bookmark and Share
  Featured Reviewer  
 
Miscellaneous (H.5.m )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Miscellaneous": Date
Learning observation skills by making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches
Hourcade J., Garcia O., Perry K.  Human factors in computing systems (CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA,1753-1758, 2007. Type: Proceedings
Jul 2 2007
The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life
Gilbert E., Karahalios K., Sandvig C.  Human factors in computing systems (Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, Apr 5-10, 2008)1603-1612, 2008. Type: Proceedings
Dec 8 2008
Designing e-learning games for rural children in India: a format for balancing learning with fun
Kam M., Agarwal A., Kumar A., Lal S., Mathur A., Tewari A., Canny J.  Designing interactive systems (Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Cape Town, South Africa, Feb 25-27, 2008)58-67, 2008. Type: Proceedings
Sep 23 2008
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy