Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
CEDAR: a low-latency and distributed strategy for packet recovery in wireless networks
Qiu C., Shen H., Soltani S., Sapra K., Jiang H., Hallstrom J. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking23 (5):1514-1527,2015.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Jul 11 2016

Error detection and correction in wireless networks is a very popular topic of research. Many improvements and enhancements are continually being developed, implemented, tested, and theorized about. Against such a rich backdrop of research material, one approach for a reviewer would be to point out the key differences between a paper and its contemporary publications. That would, however, narrow the potential beneficiaries to those already intertwined with the topic material. To avoid this, let me rather provide a brief summary on how the authors propose to improve on existing protocols in wireless networks.

To start, the authors focus on the link-layer within the protocol stack with multiple wireless hops between the source and destination nodes. Where existing protocols will decode the message at each node, the authors propose to only decode the message every N hops, where N is a function of the bit error rate, the cost of decoding the message, and any error recovery bits present in the message. The authors provide proofs, but intuition should help us see that, given a cost for decoding a message, skipping decoding on a few nodes may offset the increased probability that a packet may need retransmission.

The next part of the research deals with how to choose which nodes to perform the decoding on. Despite an optimal value of N hops between decoding nodes, it may be beneficial from a network-wide latency perspective to shift the decoding to adjacent nodes if they are less busy, to spread the computation load more evenly. Choosing which adjacent nodes to use is an NP-complete optimization problem; hence, the authors propose a heuristic approach that can be implemented as a distributed algorithm that they show, through simulation, is near optimal.

Reviewer:  Bernard Kuc Review #: CR144565 (1609-0660)
Bookmark and Share
  Featured Reviewer  
 
Wireless Communication (C.2.1 ... )
 
 
Data Communications (C.2.0 ... )
 
 
General (C.2.0 )
 
 
Performance of Systems (C.4 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Wireless Communication": Date
Mobile power management for wireless communication networks
Rulnick J., Bambos N. Wireless Networks 3(1): 3-14, 1997. Type: Article
Aug 1 1998
New call blocking versus handoff blocking in cellular networks
Sidi M., Starobinski D. Wireless Networks 3(1): 15-27, 1997. Type: Article
Sep 1 1998
The wireless Net
Fowler D. netWorker: The Craft of Network Computing 1(2): 24-34, 1997. Type: Article
Sep 1 1998
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy