Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing
Floyd S., Jacobson V., Liu C., McCanne S., Zhang L. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking5 (6):784-803,1997.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Sep 1 1998

The work reported in this paper starts from the observation that one cannot make a single reliable multicast delivery scheme that optimally meets the functionality, scalability, and efficiency requirements of all applications. It has been concluded elsewhere that the best way to meet diverse application requirements is to leave as much functionality and flexibility as possible to the applications. This approach has been successful in the design of wide-area, large-scale conferencing applications.

The scalable reliable multicast (SRM) framework is based on the group delivery model of the IP multicast protocol. SRM enhances the multicast group concept through data sharing among the members, and makes each member responsible for its own correct reception of the data.

The SRM protocol framework follows the core design principles of TCP/IP. It requires only the basic IP delivery model; no change or special support is required from the underlying IP network. SRM adjusts its parameters based on the observed performance within sessions. This allows applications using the SRM framework to adapt to a wide range of group sizes, topologies, and link bandwidths.

The paper is well written and worth reading for anyone interested in this specific area. The presentation proceeds logically and systematically from describing the design principles of the SRM framework to analysis and simulations demonstrating the performance of the framework. Related work and planned future developments by the authors are discussed.

Reviewer:  M. Tienari Review #: CR121602 (9809-0716)
Bookmark and Share
 
Network Protocols (C.2.2 )
 
 
Design Studies (C.4 ... )
 
 
General (I.6.0 )
 
 
Network Architecture And Design (C.2.1 )
 
 
Performance of Systems (C.4 )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Network Protocols": Date
An implementation of an automated protocol synthesizer (APS) and its application to the X.21 protocol
Ramamoorthy C. (ed), Dong S., Usuda Y. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-11(9): 886-908, 1985. Type: Article
Apr 1 1986
From state machines to temporal logic: specification methods for protocol standards
Schwartz R., Melliar-Smith P.  The analysis of concurrent systems (, Cambridge,651985. Type: Proceedings
Aug 1 1986
Reaching approximate agreement in the presence of faults
Dolev D., Lynch N., Pinter S., Stark E., Weihl W. Journal of the ACM 33(3): 499-516, 1986. Type: Article
Aug 1 1988
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy