Computing Reviews
Today's Issue Hot Topics Search Browse Recommended My Account Log In
Review Help
Search
Nonuniform proof systems
Kämper J. Theoretical Computer Science85 (2):305-331,1991.Type:Article
Date Reviewed: Feb 1 1993

Working in an extremely flexible framework, this paper investigates the notion of nonuniform computation. Given a function f : NN, a set B ⊆ { ⟨ O n , u ⟩ | length ( u ) = f ( n ) } is called an f-set. The triplet ( I , B , f ), with B an f-set, is a nonuniform proof system (PS) for a language A if, for all b, a string u exists with length( u ) = f ( n ) and ⟨ O n , u ⟩ ∈ B, and for all natural numbers n, for all strings u with ( u ) = f ( n ), ⟨ O n , u ⟩ ∈ B implies A ≤ n = { x | ⟨ x , u ⟩ ∈ I }. The three components of a nonuniform proof system are called, respectively, the interpretation set, the proof set, and the length function. The paper limits itself to length functions growing polynomially.

For two language classes C1 and C2, C1-C2-PSL (proof system language) denotes the class of all sets A for which a proof system with an interpretation set from C1 and a proof set from C2 exists. For example, P/Poly=P-P&Sgr;-PSL, where P&Sgr; denotes the class of all languages over a given alphabet &Sgr;. The author proves a general lowness result, from which most of the known lowness results can be derived: ( ( Co-NP ) -&Sgr; kp - PSL ) ∩ NP ⊆ L kp. (The notation is standard; see Schöning [1].)

Two particular types of nonuniform PSs are investigated: the secure PS, which allows only one-sided error when advice strings not belonging to the proof set are considered, and the dense PS, whose proof set contains the majority of all advice strings of appropriate length. Secure PSs are used for the study of classes such as APT and the P-selective sets, while dense PSs are used to describe probabilistic complexity classes.

Although the proof techniques used are not new, the proposed framework leads to some interesting new results.

Reviewer:  M. Zimand Review #: CR115822
1) Schöning, Ü. Complexity and structure. Springer, Berlin, 1986.
Bookmark and Share
 
Complexity Measures And Classes (F.1.3 )
 
 
Probabilistic Computation (F.1.2 ... )
 
 
Proof Theory (F.4.1 ... )
 
Would you recommend this review?
yes
no
Other reviews under "Complexity Measures And Classes": Date
Reversal complexity
Chen J., Yap C. SIAM Journal on Computing 20(4): 622-638, 1991. Type: Article
Oct 1 1992
Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees with integer inputs
Yao A. (ed) SIAM Journal on Computing 20(4): 655-668, 1991. Type: Article
Jul 1 1992
Handbook of theoretical computer science (vol. A)
van Leeuwen J., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990. Type: Book (9780444880710)
Sep 1 1992
more...

E-Mail This Printer-Friendly
Send Your Comments
Contact Us
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.   Copyright 1999-2024 ThinkLoud®
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy