|
Browse All Reviews > Software (D) > Software Engineering (D.2) > Metrics (D.2.8) > Software Science (D.2.8...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-5 of 5
Reviews about "Software Science (D.2.8...)":
|
Date Reviewed |
|
An empirical study of the effects of modularity on program modifiability Korson T., Vaishnavi V. (ed) Empirical studies of programmers (, Washington, DC, 1861986. Type: Proceedings
An empirical study of the effects of modularity on adaptive program maintenance (enhancing, adding, or changing existing features) is reported by the authors. The study provides evidence that a modular program can be modified faster th...
|
Jul 1 1988 |
|
Software science applied to APL Konstam A., Wood D. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-11(10): 994-1000, 1985. Type: Article
The scientific approach taken by the authors is faultless. Everything is explained carefully, plainly, and precisely. An experiment on computing APL language level, according to Halstead’s metrics [1], is conducted according ...
|
Apr 1 1986 |
|
Identifying error-prone software--an empirical study Shen V., Yu T., Thebaut S., Paulsen L. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-11(4): 317-324, 1985. Type: Article
Software testing is more art than science. Various attempts have been made, principally through software metrics, to change that fact. This paper is about one of those attempts....
|
Feb 1 1986 |
|
Parallel language recognition in constant time by cellular automata. Sommerhalder R., van Westrhenen S. Acta Informatica 19(4): 397-407, 1983. Type: Article
The language recognized by a cellular automaton is the set of the accepted initial configurations. For one-dimensional bounded cellular automata, the recognizable languages are the context-sensitive languages. This paper is focused o...
|
Mar 1 1985 |
|
Some new observations about software science indicators for estimating software quality Davcev D. Information Processing and Management: an International Journal 20(1-2): 245-247, 1984. Type: Article
The title of this paper is inappropriate: it is implementation time which is estimated, and this does not even lie along the line of software quality. The author, citing his own analysis [1] and those of Curtis finds that the estimate...
|
Feb 1 1985 |
|
|
|
|
|